|
|
The
Gospel According to Jesus
The book, The
Gospel According to Jesus, is the dissertation and defense by Dr.
John MacArthur concerning the doctrine termed by some as “lordship
salvation.” The book offers a compelling argument regarding the totality
of Jesus’ claim to “follow Me.” In as much as some have
argued that lordship salvation attempts to add to the free gift of grace
by God, Dr. MacArthur sets forth the argument that the Gospel, although entirely
a free gift, carries with it a demand that those who accept Christ as Savior
cannot do so without accepting Him as Lord. It is in this argument that Dr.
MacArthur claims that the submission to the lordship of Christ by the believer
does not contain any merit or add works to the free gift of the Gospel, but
is rather a integral part of the Gospel itself.
The book begins by setting forth the contemporary scene within evangelicalism
concerning the doctrine of salvation. Dr. MacArthur states that an easy-believism
has infiltrated the modern church whereby people are called to accept Christ
as Savior without having to accept Him as Lord. He begins by articulating that
Christ’s gospel “was a call to discipleship, a call to follow him
in submissive obedience, not just a plea to make a decision or pray a prayer.” The
Gospel then is more than just believing a set of facts or subscribing intellectually
to who Christ is or what He has done. It is a call to enter through a narrow
gate, to take up one’s cross and follow Him, to repent in a manner that
leads to righteousness, and to forsake all and follow Him.
It is interesting that Dr. MacArthur in this book debunks the arguments by many
leading dispensationalists, being a dispensationalist himself. He carefully (and
I believe humbly) shows the error of the dispensational system being carried
too far by such authors as Lewis Sperry Chafer and Charles Ryrie. He states that
dispensationalism as a system is carried too far by such men who attempt to compartmentalize “truth
to the point that they make unbiblical differentiations.” MacArthur goes
on to state that errors have been made in drawing lines of distinction between
salvation and discipleship, among other doctrines.
The picture that MacArthur paints of modern evangelicalism is a Church that is
more willing to accept a profession of faith than challenge the genuineness of
such faith as Jesus did. He shows how the rich young ruler had all the intellectual
elements of faith but could not in the end deny everything and follow Christ.
He moves on to show how Nicodemus struggled with the confrontation of his own
spiritual bankruptcy because he lived within a system that did not account such
personal inadequacy but rather looked to individual performance for acceptance
in the eyes of God. He also defends Christ’s call to the woman at the well
to worship God in spirit and in truth. This demand was not one of simply accepting
the facts about Jesus, but accepting Jesus for who He truly is, the Lord of all,
and worshipping Him as such.
The understanding of the severity of sin is critical to one’s coming to
Christ. Jesus stated that He came to seek and save the lost. He came as a healer
to the sick. MacArthur argues that people do not know they need healing until
they recognize their sickness. Again and again in the Gospels we see Christ renounce
the Pharisees and other Jewish religious leaders of his day for their attempt
at righteousness. This was a shock to the culture as most people accepted the
claims of righteousness by these men. They were intimidated by their claims.
But Jesus showed how the righteousness of these men failed when he told of the
Pharisee and the publican who came to pray. It was the publican who left justified,
according to Jesus, because he recognized his own falseness, where the Pharisee
who claimed a righteousness of his own left unjustified. MacArthur concludes “those
who think they are good enough – those who do not understand the seriousness
of sin – cannot respond to the gospel. They cannot be saved, for the gospel
is a call to sinners to repent and be forgiven.”
The bottom line is that the work of salvation is completely the work of God.
It begins and ends with him and the believer is only the beneficiary of His grace.
The result of this divine work is an opening of the eyes whereby the individual
now can understand truth. The result of this understanding is a life that moves
toward righteousness. MacArthur denies that one must first clean up his life
before trusting Christ. Rather, the fruit of trusting Christ is a life that is
characterized by progressive spiritual growth. Jesus clearly challenged those
who would want to simply agree with the facts of who He was. He demanded a denial
of everything, not just a decision. True saving faith then does not back away
from the conviction of sin and demand of holiness. Jesus “will not barter
away his right to be Lord.” In other words, justification involves not
only the belief in Jesus as Savior, but also the confession of Him as Lord. (Rom.
10:9) Those who fail to recognize and renounce their sinful state, Christ will
turn away as He did the rich young ruler.
The idea of turning and following Christ does not mean that one will be perfect.
Rather, as MacArthur defends, “the mark of a true disciple is not that
he never sins, but rather that when he does sin he inevitably returns to the
Lord to receive cleansing and forgiveness.” Those who profess Christ with
their mouth but fail to display the fruit of righteousness in their life should
question the genuineness of their faith. However, many today work to affirm the
faith of those who have “made a decision” or “walked an aisle” leading
them to recall an experience rather than looking for the evidence of the sanctifying
work of the Holy Spirit. The Gospel of Christ is a call to discipleship and should
therefore display the fruit of discipleship. Those who claim to be Christians
should look for such fruit in their lives, in the same spirit of spiritual bankruptcy
that Christ demanded in His gospel claims.
In Chapter 10, MacArthur exegetes the parable of the various soils in Matthew
13:3-9. He argues the only seeds that represent true believers in this parable
are the ones that produce fruit. The seeds do not represent believers, as some
argue. According to Jesus in a parallel account of this parable, the seed is
the Word of God. (Luke 8:11) Therefore the sower is one who spreads the Word.
His method is not faulty and the seed is not faulty. It is the soil that represents
the individual and only one soil produces germination that leads to fruit. The
soil that produces germination that does not lead to fruit represents the individual
who responds positively to the gospel claims but fails to possess true saving
faith. The evidence of true saving faith is always fruit! (John 15:8; Rom. 7:4;
Eph. 2:10)
Repentance is at the heart of the Gospel. However, in modern day evangelicalism
many leaders have devalued the true biblical meaning of this word. Because the
literal meaning of the Greek word for repentance, metanoia, means a “change
of mind”, many have limited its meaning to just involve the intellect.
But as MacArthur points out, “it always speaks of a change of purpose and
a turning from sin.” It involves three elements, “a turning to God;
a turning from evil; and the intent to serve God.” True repentance cannot
be just an intellectual exercise. It not only involves the whole person, it results
in evidence in the whole person. It is also not just a one-time event, but characterizes
a life-long commitment by true believers who when they sin readily confess and
seek cleansing. (1 John 1:9) MacArthur illustrates the emphasis on true repentance
in his mentioning of the parable of the two sons found in Matthew 21:28-31. The
second son disobeyed in word and then repented and obeyed in deed, while the
first son agreed to obey in word but disobeyed in deed. It is the repentant son
who represents the true believer.
There are many who profess Christ with their mouths but by their actions they
deny Him. (Titus 1:15-16) These are they who Christ spoke of who He will deny
in the final judgment even though they have done many things in His name. The
ones who obey are those who profess true faith because they have entered through
the narrow gate. In this entering, they have denied all they have or have done
and they have recognized their own inadequacy. They have embraced the offense
of the cross and they follow Christ. On the contrary, many leaders in Christianity
today have removed this offense and presented a gospel that “promises a
wonderful, comfortable plan for everyone’s life.” Who can read the
accounts in the New Testament either in the Gospels or the epistles and claim
that the Christian life is to be one of ease? That would require a lobotomy!
In conclusion, I have found that I agree with Dr. MacArthur’s arguments.
I have found them to be clear, logical, and most importantly, biblically based.
I must admit that I have been taught over the years that MacArthur’s doctrine
of lordship salvation was faulty. Based on my own ignorance I have even accepted
what others have told me. However, after actually reading this book I find that
my discomfort with Christ’s claims found in the Gospels were justified.
Although His Gospel is free and by grace alone, it’s demands are weighty.
This is not a contradiction with his claim that His load is easy and His burden
is light. Rather, it shows how apart from Him the requirements are quite heavy
and hard. But through His redemptive work and divine salvation in the life of
the believer, these requirements become quite possible and lead to an abundant
life. I now recognize my past errors in my evangelistic efforts. I recognize
my errors in my teaching as I have before attempted to lighten the requirements
to “forsake all” and “take up a cross”. I recognize my
errors in my own understanding of several parables. And so I realize how I must
now more clearly and more accurately articulate the union in justification of
belief in one’s heart and confession with one’s mouth that Jesus
is Lord. His Lordship cannot be removed because He is Lord. To believe Him as
Savior cannot be separated from belief in Him as Lord. The bar is set very high.
In fact, the bar is perfection. MacArthur’s argument can be summed up well
in this one statement: “perfection is the standard; direction is the test.” True
believers will display fruit that glorifies God. Anyone who does not should thoroughly
examine himself and evaluate his direction. Sola de Gloria!
JSW - June 17, 2003
|